United Kingdom. Rape. The justice system must not victimize the victim.

Lana. Victim. BSF

AIRE BSF | INTERNATIONAL ALERT

LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM — NOVEMBER 7, 2026

WORLD ORGANIZATION BULLYING SIN FRONTERAS

UNITED KINGDOM: VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE MUST NOT BECOME VICTIMS AGAIN IN THE COURTROOM

The International Observatory for Security and Prevention of Bullying Sin Fronteras calls attention to the protection of victims, judicial responsibility and the urgent need to challenge misconceptions surrounding sexual violence.

Victims of rape and sexual assault must be able to seek justice without facing a second ordeal inside the courtroom.

A major debate has emerged in the United Kingdom over the treatment of victims during sexual offence trials, following renewed calls for changes to judicial procedures and stronger protections for those who report sexual violence.

The central concern is clear: women who report rape must not be made to feel that their own behaviour, reactions or personal decisions are the real subject of the trial.

The debate has reached the highest levels of British public life, with Prime Minister Andy Burnham saying that the government must continually examine how rape trials are conducted to ensure that complainants do not feel as though they are the ones being prosecuted.

THE INTERNATIONAL OBSERVATORY FOR SECURITY AND PREVENTION: JUSTICE MUST NOT REVlCTIMIZE

The International Observatory for Security and Prevention of Bullying Sin Fronteras considers the protection of victims an essential component of any effective strategy against violence.

The judicial process should establish the facts through evidence, professional investigation and due process. It should never rely on stereotypes about how a person who has experienced sexual violence is expected to behave.

There is no single, universal response to sexual assault.

Some victims may resist physically. Others may freeze, remain silent, experience shock or fear, or delay reporting what happened. These reactions cannot be reduced to a single expected pattern.

The absence of screaming, physical resistance or an immediate police report does not, by itself, establish that an assault did not occur.

Likewise, the credibility of a complaint must be assessed through evidence and proper judicial procedures, not through preconceived ideas about how a victim should have acted.

CHALLENGING MYTHS THAT CAN UNDERMINE JUSTICE

One of the central issues in the British debate is the use of what are commonly known as rape myths: assumptions that victims must behave in a particular way for their allegations to be considered credible.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has warned that arguments based on the absence of resistance or immediate reporting can approach victim-blaming.

Victims' Commissioner Claire Waxman has called for stronger legal safeguards, including a requirement for judges to address myths and misconceptions about sexual violence when directing juries.

The objective is not to restrict the right to a fair defence. It is to ensure that decisions are based on relevant evidence rather than inaccurate assumptions about trauma and human behaviour.

THE BRITISH DEBATE AND THE NEED FOR INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

The discussion intensified following the conviction of actor Russell Brand on one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault in London. His trial became a case study in the wider debate over how complainants are questioned and how rape myths may influence public understanding of sexual violence.

Brand was acquitted of other charges. The broader institutional questions raised by the proceedings extend far beyond one individual case.

British authorities are considering proposals to strengthen protections for victims. There are also differing views among legal professionals about whether existing judicial directions are sufficient or whether additional legal requirements are necessary.

That disagreement makes one point especially important: the justice system must continuously examine whether its procedures protect both the rights of the accused and the dignity of those who report sexual violence.

PREVENTING VIOLENCE ALSO MEANS PREVENTING REVlCTIMIZATION

The International Observatory for Security and Prevention of Bullying Sin Fronteras places this issue within a broader international agenda.

Preventing violence does not end with stopping an assault. It also involves ensuring that victims can seek medical assistance, psychological support, protection and justice without being exposed to unnecessary humiliation or institutional mistreatment.

A justice system that discourages victims from reporting sexual violence weakens society's ability to confront and prevent these crimes.

The challenge is therefore not only legal. It is institutional, educational and cultural.

Every victim deserves to be heard. Every allegation deserves a serious and impartial investigation. Every defendant is entitled to due process.

AIRE BSF — INTERNATIONAL NEWS

INTERNATIONAL OBSERVATORY FOR SECURITY AND PREVENTION

WORLD ORGANIZATION BULLYING SIN FRONTERAS

Editorial sources: Metropolitan Police statements and the British Victims' Commissioner.